Saved
Instruments

Streamer bass

A bass built to copy — then legally outrun — the Spector NS-Bass. It wins on ergonomics, loses on originality.

Worth your time?3.5/5Yes.Use the whole thing.What works, what does not, who it is for ↓
8:27in productionCh. 1 · 1982: A launch, not a leap/ 8:27 · ceiling 15 min
4 chapters · 8:27Ceiling 15:00

The brief is written and checked. The video joins this page when it is cut.4 chapters · 1 min read · 8:27 planned

Read the brief

The Streamer bass is a functional, ergonomic, and legally contested instrument. It does one thing well: deliver focused low-end articulation in a comfortable, German-built package. It does nothing else — no tonal flexibility, no innovation, no independent identity in its first years. Its history is defined by imitation, negotiation, and eventual divergence — not invention.

Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 0:56
    1982: A launch, not a leap

    Launched in 1982, the Streamer was Warwick’s first serious entry into the professional bass market.

  2. 2:14
    Copy by design

    The first Streamers were near-exact copies of the Spector NS-Bass — down to the body shape and layout.

  3. 3:26
    The 1985 reckoning

    Warwick paid licensing fees to Spector and Steinberger after being confronted at Musikmesse 1985.

  4. 4:50
    The redesign that ended the lawsuit

    Litigation was dropped only after Warwick changed the Streamer’s design to break visual and structural parity with the NS-Bass.

1 more chapterFewer chapters
Worth your time?

Yes. Use the whole thing.

3.5/ 5
What works
  • delivers tight low-mid punch
  • balances well on strap
  • offers full 24-fret access thanks to deep cutaway
What does not
  • offer tonal versatility
  • redefine bass design
  • stand apart from its origins without legal pressure
Use it if
  • players prioritising upper-fret access
  • collectors interested in post-litigation design shifts
  • historians of instrument IP disputes
Skip it if
  • players seeking tonal variety
  • those avoiding instruments with contested provenance
  • beginners needing forgiving ergonomics or intuitive controls
Who should use it, and who should skipHide who it is for
The written brief1 min read

What it is and what it was built for

A bass guitar launched by Warwick in 1982. Built to compete directly with the Spector NS-Bass. Designed for professional players needing stage-ready reliability and extended range.

How it works, in terms a player would use

It is a solid-body bass guitar with a bolt-on neck and passive electronics. The design follows the Spector NS-Bass layout: asymmetrical body, deep cutaway, and a long scale length. Players access all frets easily. Controls are simple — volume and tone knobs, no pickup selector.

What it does better than anything else

It delivers tight, articulate low-mid punch in a physically balanced package. The body shape improves upper-fret reach over many contemporaries. Its build quality — German workshop standards of the early 1980s — exceeds mass-market alternatives of the same era.

What it does badly

It offers little tonal variation. Passive electronics limit dynamic shaping. The early versions lack originality — they copy without reinterpretation. Later revisions avoid litigation but do not redefine the instrument’s voice.

What people made with it

No verified recordings, players, genres, or releases are stated in the sources. Nothing can be claimed about usage.

Who should use it, and who should not

Players who value physical comfort and focused low-end articulation. Not for those seeking innovation, tonal breadth, or instruments free from contested design origins.

Is it worth your time

Yes, if you need a mid-1980s German-built bass with clear low-end focus and ergonomic access. No, if you require tonal versatility, modern ergonomics, or legal clarity around its lineage.

Same bench · Instruments4 of 144
8:47
Warwick Thumb SCWarwickThe Warwick Thumb SC is a 2010 single-cut bass born from a fan forum contest. It adapts the Thumb NT shape with new tonewoods and adds coil-splitting via two mini toggles—its sole functional departure from the NT. It has no passive mode, no 6-string option, and no historical lineage beyond its 2009–2010 development cycle.
9:29
Epiphone Jack Casady Signature BassEpiphoneThe Epiphone Jack Casady Signature Bass is a 4-string semi-hollow bass guitar co-developed by Jack Casady and Epiphone. It features a maple body, mahogany neck, and a custom low-impedance humbucking pickup connected to a transformer with a three-position impedance selector (50, 250, or 500 ohms). It was designed specifically to improve tonal definition in ensemble playing — a documented shortcoming of the 1970s-era Gibson Les Paul Signature bass. It belongs to Epiphone’s list of exclusive electric bass guitars. It offers no tone controls, no second pickup, and no active circuitry. Its tonal range is defined entirely by impedance selection: lower values yield clarity and balance; higher values yield output and bass weight.
8:55
Music Man StingRayMusic Man · 1976The Music Man StingRay is a 1976 electric bass co-designed by Leo Fender as a modern update to the Precision Bass. It introduced active electronics to bass design — a 9-volt-powered preamp with 2-band EQ, an oversized humbucker wired in parallel, and epoxy-sealed circuitry. It delivers a uniquely bright, scooped-mid, deep-low tone with high output and rigidity. It lacks passive tone shaping, midrange control in early models, and serviceable electronics. It became essential for slap bass, studio clarity, and cutting through dense mixes.
9:17
Alembic Series IIAlembicThe Alembic Series II is a 4-string bass guitar with stereo output, a 30.75-inch short scale option, and individual low-pass filters with continuously variable Q per pickup. It differs from Series I only in stereo capability and price. No claims are made about tonal superiority, build innovation, or broader usability.
Up next in Audio

Warwick Thumb SC

Warwick · 8:47

Warwick’s first single-cut bass isn’t a compromise—it’s a fan-built response to market pressure, with coil-splitting as its only real innovation.

8:47