audiobriefs
10:11in productionCh. 1 · Live-first design/ 10:11 · ceiling 15 min
Microphones & preamps · Studio & recording

Shure Beta 58A

It doesn’t sound natural — it sounds cut-through-ready.

A live vocal mic defined by rejection, presence, and deliberate low-end roll-off.

Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 1:02
    Live-first design

    Built for stage volume, not studio silence.

  2. 2:44
    The 1996 cartridge swap

    No hum-bucking coil. An output transformer instead.

  3. 4:22
    What the frequency response does

    Attenuated lows. Two presence peaks. Supercardioid only.

  4. 6:30
    Recognition, not revision

    TEC Award winner the year it launched.

Worth your time?

Yes. Use the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • cuts through stage noise
  • resists feedback at high gain
  • delivers consistent presence with minimal EQ
What does not
  • reproduce full-range sources
  • offer switchable patterns
  • suit quiet or nuanced vocal applications
Use it if
  • front-of-house engineers
  • touring vocalists
  • venues with high ambient SPL
Skip it if
  • voice-over studios
  • acoustic instrument capture
  • low-volume podcast setups
The written brief1 min read

What it is and what it was built for

A dynamic supercardioid microphone built for live vocal use. Introduced in 1996 as a redesign of the Beta 58. Part of Shure’s Beta Series, launched in 1989.

How it works, in terms a player would use

It is a dynamic supercardioid microphone. It rejects sound from the sides. It attenuates low frequencies below 500 Hz to counter proximity effect. It boosts presence at 4 kHz and 10 kHz. It uses an output transformer. It has no hum-bucking coil.

What it does better than anything else

It isolates vocals in loud environments better than most dynamic mics. Its supercardioid pattern rejects side-stage bleed more tightly than cardioid SM58s. Its neodymium magnet gives higher output than older SM-series designs.

What it does badly

It rolls off below 500 Hz. It cannot reproduce deep bass or full-range acoustic instruments cleanly. Its presence peaks fatigue some voices over long sets. It offers no pattern switching or pad.

What people made with it

Live vocal performances on stages worldwide. No specific recordings, artists, venues or releases are named in the sources.

Who should use it, and who should not

Front-of-house engineers and touring vocalists who need consistent rejection and high-SPL handling. Not studio engineers seeking transparency, or podcasters needing low-end warmth.

Is it worth your time

Yes — if you need a live vocal mic that cuts through stage noise without feedback. No — if you need extended low-end, flat response, or studio-grade neutrality.

Same bench · Microphones & preamps4 of 11
Up next in Audio

Music Man (company)

Music Man · 1971 · 11:02

It didn’t sound warm—it sounded wired: the first bass that boosted instead of rolled off.

11:02