Saved
Synths & drum machines · Sound design & sampling

Korg Z1

The Z1 didn’t simulate instruments — it simulated physics, and forced you to speak its language.

Worth your time?4/5Yes.Use the whole thing.What works, what does not, who it is for ↓
8:38in productionCh. 1 · Not Analog. Not Sampled./ 8:38 · ceiling 15 min
4 chapters · 8:38Ceiling 15:00

The brief is written and checked. The video joins this page when it is cut.4 chapters · 2 min read · 8:38 planned

Read the brief

The Korg Z1 is a 1997 digital synthesizer using physical modelling synthesis with 12-voice polyphony. It extends Korg's MOSS system—first introduced in the 1995 Prophecy—into a polyphonic, multitimbral format, incorporating OASYS-based physical modelling engines, two physically modelled oscillators per voice plus sub-oscillator and noise generator, and performance features including a 61-note keyboard with aftertouch and an XY touchpad.

Chapters & takeaways4
  1. 0:53
    Not Analog. Not Sampled.

    It is digital, not analog — and MOSS was built for physical realism, not vintage emulation.

  2. 2:19
    From Prophecy to Polyphony

    It added polyphony, multitimbrality, and new physical models to the Prophecy’s monophonic core.

  3. 3:38
    Twelve Voices of Physics

    Twelve voices, each with two physical oscillators, sub, and noise — the first time this architecture worked across parts.

  4. 5:06
    Keys That Breathe and Speak

    The 61-note keyboard delivers aftertouch and feeds a polyphonic arpeggiator — rare in 1997.

1 more chapterFewer chapters
Worth your time?

Yes. Use the whole thing.

4/ 5
What works
  • multitimbral physical modelling
  • polyphonic arpeggiation
  • aftertouch-responsive physical models
  • XY touchpad modulation
What does not
  • simulate instruments
  • offer sampling
  • include effects
Use it if
  • players who value tactile physical modelling over convenience
  • collectors who want the first multitimbral physical modelling synth
Skip it if
  • producers who rely on recallable plugin chains
  • those needing more than 12 voices
Who should use it, and who should skipHide who it is for
The written brief2 min read

What it is and what it was built for

A 1997 digital synthesizer built to prove physical modelling could be polyphonic, multitimbral, and performable. It extends Korg’s MOSS system — introduced in the 1995 Prophecy — into a full keyboard instrument with performance controls and expanded modelling engines derived from OASYS.

How it works, in terms a player would use

It uses physical modelling synthesis, not samples or analog circuits. Each voice runs two physically modelled oscillators, a sub-oscillator, and a noise generator. You shape sound with parameters tied to physical behaviour — string tension, tube length, reed hardness — not abstract filter cutoffs. The XY touchpad moves two real-time parameters at once. The 61-note keyboard gives velocity sensitivity and aftertouch. The polyphonic arpeggiator triggers across all 12 voices simultaneously.

What it does better than anything else

It was the world’s first multitimbral physical modelling synthesizer. Nothing else in 1997 let you run six different physical models — a plucked string, a blown flute, a struck metal bar, a bowed violin, a resonant vocal tract, a rubbery synth bass — all at once, each responding to aftertouch and XY motion.

What it does badly

It cannot layer more than 12 voices. It has no built-in effects beyond what MOSS engines include. It offers no sampling, no wavetable scanning, no granular control. Its interface relies on menu diving and soft buttons, not dedicated knobs for every parameter. There is no sequencer or audio recording.

What people made with it

The sources do not state what people made with it.

Who should use it, and who should not

A player who values tactile physical modelling over convenience or modern workflow. A collector or studio builder who wants the first instrument to deliver resonant, dynamic, non-repetitive tones from algorithmic synthesis — not playback. Not for producers who rely on recallable plugin chains or instant timbral variation.

Is it worth your time

Yes — if you want hands-on physical modelling in a pre-VST era instrument that still behaves like hardware. No — if you need deep sample manipulation, seamless DAW integration, or more than 12 voices. It does one thing first, and does it without compromise: multitimbral physical modelling in 1997.

Same bench · Synths & drum machines4 of 241
10:49
Korg MS-20Korg · 1978A monophonic analog synthesizer from 1978. Two VCOs. Two VCFs in series: high-pass then low-pass. Ring modulation on VCO2. Modulation generator with pulse and sloped outputs. Two envelope generators. Noise source. Modulation VCA. External control via frequency-voltage converter and envelope follower. Patch panel enables rerouting of audio and modulation signals.
8:52
Korg miniKORG 700KorgThe miniKORG 700 is Korg’s first monophonic analog synthesizer, released in 1973. Designed for organists, it sits atop an organ with controls facing upward. It features five oscillator waveforms including two pulse-width modulation variants, an envelope with attack and 'singing' (decay/release), a 'sustain' toggle that functions only as release, and a dual-filter 'Traveler' system with a safety constraint preventing silence. Its filters produce vocal-like sounds.
9:20
Korg PS-3300KorgThe Korg PS-3300 is a 1977 polyphonic analog synthesizer built from three PS-3100-derived units (PSU-3301), delivering 144 voices with independent oscillators, filters, envelopes, and amplifiers per note. It enables multitimbral sound creation through individual module adjustment and mixing. It omits the PS-3100's ensemble effect. It supports extensive voltage control and patching — including pitch modulation from envelopes or external sources — and uses a detachable keyboard format. It belongs to Korg’s 1970s line of large, expensive, patchable instruments, positioned as a high-end professional device.
9:59
Korg PolysixKorgThe Korg Polysix is a 1981 six-voice polyphonic analog synthesizer designed for affordability through single-oscillator-per-voice architecture, compensated by built-in bucket-brigade-based chorus/phaser/ensemble effects — features that were relatively uncommon at launch and contributed to its accessibility and sonic richness.
Up next in Audio

Rickenbacker 330

Rickenbacker · 9:28

It doesn’t sing — it rings, cuts, and refuses to blend.

9:28